On Mon, Oct 06, 2014 at 12:02:47PM -0700, Olav Haugan wrote: > On 9/25/2014 10:01 AM, Joerg Roedel wrote: > >On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 03:45:50PM -0700, Olav Haugan wrote: > >>+static inline int iommu_map_sg(struct iommu_domain *domain, unsigned long iova, > >>+ struct scatterlist *sg, unsigned int nents, > >>+ int prot, unsigned long flags) > >>+{ > >>+ return domain->ops->map_sg(domain, iova, sg, nents, prot, flags); > >>+} > >>+ > >>+static inline int iommu_unmap_sg(struct iommu_domain *domain, > >>+ unsigned long iova, size_t size, > >>+ unsigned long flags) > >>+{ > >>+ return domain->ops->unmap_sg(domain, iova, size, flags); > >>+} > > > >I have thought a little bit more about this interface and think that it > >would be better to just return a size_t from iommu_map_sg(). The > >function returns the amount of address space mapped by it, 0 in the > >worst case. > > > >This makes it easy to unmap the region just with > >iommu_unmap(domain, iova, size) in the end and removing the need for a > >new iommu_unmap_sg() function. Also the error-path of the map_sg > >call-backs becomes easier as the function then just returns the amount > >of address-space already mapped before the error happened. > > > >So the prototype would be: > > > > size_t iommu_map_sg(struct iommu_domain *domain, > > unsigned long iova, > > struct scatterlist *sg, > > unsigned int nents, > > int prot); > > > >(as I said before, the flags parameter should not be added by this > > patch-set). > > > > Ok, sounds good. I'll post v6 soon. Perhaps make the return value ssize_t so that we can propagate errors? Thierry
Attachment:
pgpdAXxbSYKPv.pgp
Description: PGP signature