On 14 Oct 12:13 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-10-14 at 15:47 -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> > On 14 Oct 06:09 PM, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2014-10-14 at 11:39 -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> > > > Please use some pr_fmt for this. Something like this before the headers
> > > > should be enough:
> > > >
> > > > #define pr_fmt(fmt) "UBI: block:" fmt
> > >
> > > Sinc ubiblock is a device, there should be a 'struct device' somewhere,
> > > so probably dev_printk() and other dev_*() printing functions would be a
> > > better choice?
> > >
> >
> > A quick code dig shows you should get the struct device associated
> > to the struct gendisk, with the disk_to_dev() macro.
> >
> > In other words, something like this should work, provided 'dev' is defined
> > in the scope as a struct ubiblock:
> >
> > #define ubiblock_err(x) dev_err(disk_to_dev(dev->gd), x)
> >
> > When the gendisk is not available, a simple pr_{} would work.
>
> Or maybe combine these in the ubi_<level> calls passing
> NULL when there is no struct ubi_device *
>
> void ubi_err(const struct ubi_device *ubi, fmt. ...)
> {
> struct va_format vaf;
> va_list args;
>
> va_start(args, fmt);
>
> vaf.fmt = fmt;
> vaf.va = &args;
>
> if (ubi && ubi->gd)
> dev_err(disk_to_dev(dev->gd), "UBI-%d error: %pF %pV",
> ubi->ubi_num, __builtin_return_address(0), &vaf);
> else if (ubi)
> printk(KERN_ERR "UBI-%d error: %pf: %pV",
> ubi->ubi_num, __builtin_return_address(0), &vaf);
> else
> printk(KERN_ERR "UBI: error: %pf: %pV",
> __builtin_return_address(0), &vaf);
>
> va_end(args);
> }
>
Isn't this excessive obfuscation? What's the benefit of it?
--
Ezequiel García, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android Engineering
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
