Re: [PATCH v3] dt-bindings: mfd: convert to yaml Qualcomm SPMI PMIC

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 10 Aug 2022, David Heidelberg wrote:

> On 10/08/2022 12:57, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Tue, 09 Aug 2022, Rob Herring wrote:
> > 
> > > On Sun, 26 Jun 2022 21:16:30 +0200, David Heidelberg wrote:
> > > > Convert Qualcomm SPMI PMIC binding to yaml format.
> > > > 
> > > > Additional changes:
> > > >   - filled many missing compatibles
> > > > 
> > > > Co-developed-by: Caleb Connolly <caleb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Signed-off-by: David Heidelberg <david@xxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > > > v3:
> > > >   - added subnodes, there are two not converted to YAML yet, but it works
> > > >   - now it prints milion directly unrelated warning to this binding
> > > >     (it's related to the included subnodes bindings, can be merged,
> > > >      but it'll generate more warnings and preferably anyone can takeover
> > > >      from here)
> > > >   - add qcom,pmx65
> > > > 
> > > > v2:
> > > >   - changed author to myself, kept Caleb as co-author
> > > >   - moved nodename to properties
> > > >   - add nodenames for pm* with deprecated property
> > > >   - add ^$ to pattern properties
> > > >   - dropped interrupt-names property
> > > >   - added reg prop. to the nodes which have register in nodename
> > > >   - added compatible pmx55
> > > > Signed-off-by: David Heidelberg <david@xxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > > >   .../bindings/mfd/qcom,spmi-pmic.txt           |  94 ---------
> > > >   .../bindings/mfd/qcom,spmi-pmic.yaml          | 191 ++++++++++++++++++
> > > >   2 files changed, 191 insertions(+), 94 deletions(-)
> > > >   delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/qcom,spmi-pmic.txt
> > > >   create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/qcom,spmi-pmic.yaml
> > > > 
> > > As this hasn't been picked up, I applied it. Thanks!
> > I'd prefer to take it via MFD if it's all the same to you.
> > 
> > In case there are additional fix-ups required during the next cycle.
> 
> I can rebase it against MFD if it's more convenient.

*Shouldn't* be required.  I suspect it'll just apply.

-- 
DEPRECATED: Please use lee@xxxxxxxxxx



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux