On 29/07/2022 15:01, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
On 29.07.2022 13:33, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
On 28/07/2022 14:51, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 28/07/2022 13:16, Shinjo Park wrote:
Change the reference of sleep_clk to the same as qcom-apq8064.dtsi.
You add label, not change something.
Signed-off-by: Shinjo Park <peremen@xxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: David Heidelberg <david@xxxxxxx>
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8960.dtsi | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8960.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8960.dtsi
index e8cd1c9c0..991eb1948 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8960.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8960.dtsi
@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ pxo_board: pxo_board {
clock-output-names = "pxo_board";
};
- sleep_clk {
+ sleep_clk: sleep_clk {
Since you touch the line, make the device node sleep-clk (device node
names should not have underscores) and mention this in commit msg.
Then we are back to the compat issues, since the gcc expects the 'sleep_clk' clock.
clock-output-names = "sleep_clk";
Ack then. Didn't notice that msm8960 has one.
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
