On Monday, October 06, 2014 09:19:05 AM Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > Hello, > > On Wed, 10 Sep 2014 14:08:24 +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > > > Thomas Petazzoni (4): > > cpufreq: allow driver-specific data > > cpufreq: cpufreq-dt: extend with platform_data > > ARM: mvebu: use the cpufreq-dt platform_data for independent clocks > > cpufreq: cpufreq-dt: adjust message related to regulators > > > > arch/arm/mach-mvebu/pmsu.c | 8 +++++++- > > drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++---- > > drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 15 +++++++++++++++ > > include/linux/cpufreq-dt.h | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++ > > include/linux/cpufreq.h | 2 ++ > > 5 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > create mode 100644 include/linux/cpufreq-dt.h > > Since this series was Acked-by Viresh, would it be possible to get it > merged for 3.18 ? I'm still seeing discussion going on about patch [1/4], though. Is that irrelevant? Also I'd prefer Viresh to tell me that this is 3.18 material instead of sending ACKs in random replies and hoping that I'll notice them. I may not. -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
