Re: [PATCH V3 2/2] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Update lpassaudio clock controller for resets

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Quoting Satya Priya (2022-07-20 04:22:24)
> From: Taniya Das <quic_tdas@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> The lpass audio supports TX/RX/WSA block resets. Also to keep
> consistency update lpasscore to lpass_core.

Consistency with what?

>
> Fixes: 9499240d15f2 ("arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Add lpasscore & lpassaudio clock controllers")
> Signed-off-by: Taniya Das <quic_tdas@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Satya Priya <quic_c_skakit@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Changes since v3:
>  - Remove the status="disabled" from lpasscc node.
>
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi | 5 +++--
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
> index 71735bb..c641f0b 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
> @@ -2184,6 +2184,7 @@
>                         power-domains = <&lpass_aon LPASS_AON_CC_LPASS_AUDIO_HM_GDSC>;
>                         #clock-cells = <1>;
>                         #power-domain-cells = <1>;
> +                       #reset-cells = <1>;

Is there a binding update for qcom,sc7280-lpassaudiocc?

>                 };
>
>                 lpass_aon: clock-controller@3380000 {
> @@ -2191,13 +2192,13 @@
>                         reg = <0 0x03380000 0 0x30000>;
>                         clocks = <&rpmhcc RPMH_CXO_CLK>,
>                                <&rpmhcc RPMH_CXO_CLK_A>,
> -                              <&lpasscore LPASS_CORE_CC_CORE_CLK>;
> +                              <&lpass_core LPASS_CORE_CC_CORE_CLK>;

Is this really necessary?

>                         clock-names = "bi_tcxo", "bi_tcxo_ao", "iface";
>                         #clock-cells = <1>;
>                         #power-domain-cells = <1>;
>                 };
>
> -               lpasscore: clock-controller@3900000 {
> +               lpass_core: clock-controller@3900000 {

Is this really necessary?

>                         compatible = "qcom,sc7280-lpasscorecc";
>                         reg = <0 0x03900000 0 0x50000>;
>                         clocks = <&rpmhcc RPMH_CXO_CLK>;



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux