Quoting Satya Priya (2022-07-20 04:22:24)
> From: Taniya Das <quic_tdas@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> The lpass audio supports TX/RX/WSA block resets. Also to keep
> consistency update lpasscore to lpass_core.
Consistency with what?
>
> Fixes: 9499240d15f2 ("arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Add lpasscore & lpassaudio clock controllers")
> Signed-off-by: Taniya Das <quic_tdas@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Satya Priya <quic_c_skakit@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Changes since v3:
> - Remove the status="disabled" from lpasscc node.
>
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi | 5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
> index 71735bb..c641f0b 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
> @@ -2184,6 +2184,7 @@
> power-domains = <&lpass_aon LPASS_AON_CC_LPASS_AUDIO_HM_GDSC>;
> #clock-cells = <1>;
> #power-domain-cells = <1>;
> + #reset-cells = <1>;
Is there a binding update for qcom,sc7280-lpassaudiocc?
> };
>
> lpass_aon: clock-controller@3380000 {
> @@ -2191,13 +2192,13 @@
> reg = <0 0x03380000 0 0x30000>;
> clocks = <&rpmhcc RPMH_CXO_CLK>,
> <&rpmhcc RPMH_CXO_CLK_A>,
> - <&lpasscore LPASS_CORE_CC_CORE_CLK>;
> + <&lpass_core LPASS_CORE_CC_CORE_CLK>;
Is this really necessary?
> clock-names = "bi_tcxo", "bi_tcxo_ao", "iface";
> #clock-cells = <1>;
> #power-domain-cells = <1>;
> };
>
> - lpasscore: clock-controller@3900000 {
> + lpass_core: clock-controller@3900000 {
Is this really necessary?
> compatible = "qcom,sc7280-lpasscorecc";
> reg = <0 0x03900000 0 0x50000>;
> clocks = <&rpmhcc RPMH_CXO_CLK>;
