On 22-07-07 13:03:06, Abel Vesa wrote: > For consistency, use clk_core_unlink_consumer rather then hlist_del > directly, on __clk_put. Prepare lock is already acquired at that point. > > Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@xxxxxxxxxx> Gentle ping. > --- > drivers/clk/clk.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c > index 7fc191c15507..e1d8245866b1 100644 > --- a/drivers/clk/clk.c > +++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c > @@ -4347,7 +4347,7 @@ void __clk_put(struct clk *clk) > clk->exclusive_count = 0; > } > > - hlist_del(&clk->clks_node); > + clk_core_unlink_consumer(clk); > if (clk->min_rate > clk->core->req_rate || > clk->max_rate < clk->core->req_rate) > clk_core_set_rate_nolock(clk->core, clk->core->req_rate); > -- > 2.34.3 >
