Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: clock: qcom,rpmcc: Add compatible for SM6375

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 16/07/2022 21:27, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> Add a compatible for RPMCC on SM6375.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,rpmcc.yaml | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,rpmcc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,rpmcc.yaml
> index 9d296b89a8d0..f22febdfdce7 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,rpmcc.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,rpmcc.yaml
> @@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ properties:
>            - qcom,rpmcc-sdm660
>            - qcom,rpmcc-sm6115
>            - qcom,rpmcc-sm6125
> +          - qcom,sm6375-rpmcc

I am fine with it, although this contradicts a bit
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220705161301.493364-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx/

Would be nice to get Bjorn's opinion/preference on this.

Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx>


Best regards,
Krzysztof



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux