On Tue 30 Sep 15:14 PDT 2014, Jeffrey Hugo wrote:
> On 9/29/2014 10:35 PM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
[..]
> > +static int qcom_hwspinlock_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > +{
> > + struct device_node *node = pdev->dev.of_node;
> > + const struct of_device_id *match;
> > + struct hwspinlock_device *bank;
> > + struct hwspinlock *hwlock;
> > + struct resource *res;
> > + void __iomem *iobase;
> > + unsigned stride, i;
> > + size_t array_size;
> > + u32 num_locks;
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + match = of_match_device(qcom_hwspinlock_of_match, &pdev->dev);
> Didn't this have error handling in v2?
It did, but as this is a platform_device and we only support DTthere is no way
match will be NULL if we end up here. So the possible check would be to see
that data is non-null, but for this driver that wouldn't make sense.
Regards,
Bjorn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
