On Tue 30 Sep 12:59 PDT 2014, Andy Gross wrote: > On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 06:53:24PM -0700, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > > On Mon 29 Sep 15:00 PDT 2014, Andy Gross wrote: > > > > > The runtime pm calls need to be done before populating the children via the > > > i2c_add_adapter call. If this is not done, a child can run into issues trying > > > to do i2c read/writes due to the pm_runtime_sync failing. > > > > > > > May I ask in what case this would fail? I thought we tested this as we found > > the faulty error check after calling pm_runtime_get_sync(). > > This is a different kind of failure. If during probe, the children do some I2C > activity, they will encounter issues with the runtime_sync due to the pm_runtime > not being initialized. However, once the qup probe completes, everything works > fine. > > The original runtime_sync issue revolved around the runtime_sync return value > being misinterpreted due to the incorrect check. > Yeah, I just wondered why my testing didn't trigger this. But I suspect that the answer is simply that the client I ran with did not do i2c accesses from probe. Regards, Bjorn -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
