On 14/07/2022 09:41, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On 14/07/2022 00:29, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
>> On Mon 20 Jun 06:07 CDT 2022, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>
>>> Add pxo/cxo clocks to the GCC device tree node.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8660.dtsi | 6 ++++--
>>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8660.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8660.dtsi
>>> index 47b97daecef1..61e3ab0ebfd3 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8660.dtsi
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8660.dtsi
>>> @@ -50,13 +50,13 @@ cpu-pmu {
>>> };
>>>
>>> clocks {
>>> - cxo_board {
>>> + cxo_board: cxo_board {
>>
>> As requested by Krzysztof, please use clock-output-names to specify the
>> name of the clock, and rename the node "cxo-board-clk".
>
> Actually I believe Krzysztof agreed (and acked) this change, as it
> follows the example of existing boards.
Yeah, because this would be out of scope of this change. In the long
term fixing the node name would be still useful, because DTC W=2 complains.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
