Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: qcom: fix the smmu interrupt values

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 11:11:33PM +0530, Parikshit Pareek wrote:
> There has been wrong values introduced for context interrupt for
> smu node apps_smmu. Fix those ones with due correction.
> 
> Fixes: 152d1faf1e2f ("arm64: dts: qcom: add SC8280XP platform")
> Signed-off-by: Parikshit Pareek <quic_ppareek@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp.dtsi | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp.dtsi
> index 7945cbb57bb4..1276a833251e 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp.dtsi
> @@ -1580,7 +1580,6 @@
>  				     <GIC_SPI 412 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>  				     <GIC_SPI 421 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>  				     <GIC_SPI 706 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> -				     <GIC_SPI 424 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>  				     <GIC_SPI 423 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>  				     <GIC_SPI 424 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>  				     <GIC_SPI 425 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> @@ -1591,6 +1590,7 @@
>  				     <GIC_SPI 693 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>  				     <GIC_SPI 694 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>  				     <GIC_SPI 695 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> +				     <GIC_SPI 696 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>  				     <GIC_SPI 410 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>  				     <GIC_SPI 411 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>  				     <GIC_SPI 420 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> -- 
> 2.17.1
> 

I think you'll wanna use the subject prefix "arm64: dts: qcom: sc8280xp:"
here, and in my opinion removing the 424 irq should be
referred to as removing a duplicate (since its still listed), and
then another patch adding the missing one. Super pedantic but I'd do it
like:

  1: arm64: dts: qcom: sc8280xp: remove duplicate apps_smmu irq
  2: arm64: dts: qcom: sc8280xp: add missing apps_smmu irq

That being said that's just my opinionated drive by review.

For what it is worth I checked the downstream source I have access to
and the diff here makes sense to me, so with the commit message fixed up
a bit (at least including the proper prefix):

    Reviewed-by: Andrew Halaney <ahalaney@xxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks,
Andrew




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux