On Fri, Jul 08, 2022 at 02:44:19AM +0100, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
> msm8939 will use qcom-cpufreq-nvmem. Block it on the generic cpufreq-dt
> list.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@xxxxxxxxxx>
Personally I would defer this patch as well until cpufreq is properly
enabled on msm8939 together with the qcom-cpufreq-nvmem changes and CPR.
I'm not strictly opposed to get this in now, but it also does not really
make any functional difference, or does it?
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c
> index 2c96de3f2d83c..26c97ab778974 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c
> @@ -137,6 +137,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id blocklist[] __initconst = {
> { .compatible = "nvidia,tegra210", },
>
> { .compatible = "qcom,apq8096", },
> + { .compatible = "qcom,msm8939", },
> { .compatible = "qcom,msm8996", },
> { .compatible = "qcom,qcs404", },
> { .compatible = "qcom,sa8155p" },
> --
> 2.36.1
>
