On 06/07/2022 12:14, Christian Marangi wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 06, 2022 at 10:39:16AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 05/07/2022 15:39, Christian Marangi wrote:
>>> Add missing smem node for ipq8064.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> Tested-by: Jonathan McDowell <noodles@xxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-ipq8064.dtsi | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-ipq8064.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-ipq8064.dtsi
>>> index b5aede3d7ccf..98527a7d885e 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-ipq8064.dtsi
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-ipq8064.dtsi
>>> @@ -908,6 +908,11 @@ lcc: clock-controller@28000000 {
>>> #reset-cells = <1>;
>>> };
>>>
>>> + sfpb_mutex_block: syscon@1200600 {
>>> + compatible = "syscon";
>>
>> syscon alone is not allowed.
>>
>
> Mh... This is problematic. How this should be handled?
As usual - add specific compatible.
Maybe I was not specific enough, but my commit was under compatible, not
under device node, so it seems obvious. Just in case it is not obvious -
you cannot have "syscon" compatible alone.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
