On 05/07/2022 19:19, Stephan Gerhold wrote: > On Tue, Jul 05, 2022 at 06:13:01PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> Compatibles can come in two formats. Either "vendor,ip-soc" or >> "vendor,soc-ip". Qualcomm bindings were mixing both of usages, so add a >> DT schema file documenting preferred policy and enforcing it for all new >> compatibles, except few existing patterns. >> >> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> > [...] >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom-soc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom-soc.yaml >> new file mode 100644 >> index 000000000000..0be18c1d2961 >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom-soc.yaml > [...] >> + pattern: "^qcom,.*(apq|ipq|mdm|msm|qcs|sa|sc|sdm|sdx|sm)[0-9]+.*$" > > FWIW: There is also the "qcm" prefix, used e.g. in "qcom,qcm2290-tlmm". > > Also, the APQ equivalent of "sdm" would be "sda", e.g. SDA845 which is > used in the DB845c. (Not sure if someone will ever use the SDA variant > in a compatible though.) I expect the list/pattern to grow, but of course I can add these now. Best regards, Krzysztof
