On 28/06/2022 02:45, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 27-06-22, 13:50, Rob Herring wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 04:33:40PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>> In the example, alone compatible "qcom,qcs404" is not correct. Add >>> proper board compatibles for QCS404 Evaluation Board. >>> >>> Reported-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> >>> --- >>> >>> Can be picked up independently, although the issue reported by Rob was >>> caused by: >>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAL_JsqKXDs=QHKob2Xy6vAFZfnkM9ggfmqf9TNA1hv8TScTmgQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ >> >> Best to go in that tree unless it's going to take weeks... > > Lemme know Krzysztof about the timing, I am going to send a pull > request for cpufreq fixes very soon, so I can take it as well if you > want. Thanks Viresh, but I think Rob has a point here - this should be rather same tree, otherwise checks on your tree complain about undocumented board compatibles from this patch (because they are in this original tree). I'll take it and add to my pull request for Rob or Bjorn. Best regards, Krzysztof
