On 2022-06-10 12:01:10, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Marijn Suijten (2022-06-10 00:46:32)
> > On 2022-06-09 15:12:09, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > > Quoting Dmitry Baryshkov (2022-06-02 03:20:19)
> > > > On Thu, 2 Jun 2022 at 01:07, Marijn Suijten
> > > > <marijn.suijten@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-fixed-factor.c b/drivers/clk/clk-fixed-factor.c
> > > > > index 54942d758ee6..fabb98d0cdb2 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/clk/clk-fixed-factor.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/clk/clk-fixed-factor.c
> > > > > @@ -148,17 +151,50 @@ struct clk_hw *devm_clk_hw_register_fixed_factor_index(struct device *dev,
> > > > > const char *name, unsigned int index, unsigned long flags,
> > > > > unsigned int mult, unsigned int div)
> > > > > {
> > > > > - return __clk_hw_register_fixed_factor(dev, NULL, name, NULL, index,
> > > > > - flags, mult, div, true);
> > > > > + return __clk_hw_register_fixed_factor(dev, NULL, name, NULL, NULL,
> > > > > + index, flags, mult, div, true);
> > > >
> > > > Here (and several times later) you are inserting an argument and then
> > > > moving arguments to the next line. My slight preference would be to
> > > > just insert the arg (and maybe break the line if it gets too long) w/o
> > > > touching the next lines.
> >
> > That'll definitely look odd, as we'll end up with index floating on a
> > single line, all on its own.
>
> Pretty sure Dmitry is suggesting to make the line longer, not put the
> index on a line by itself. Ignore the 80-column limit.
There's a "(and maybe break the line if it gets too long)" in there, but
it's ugly especially for short (ie. "0,") arguments. I'm following your
request to ignore 80-columns as a limit.
Will resend this after being able to physically build-test it tomorrow,
thanks!
- Marijn
