On 09/24/14 06:49, Lina Iyer wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 24 2014 at 00:14 -0600, Pramod Gurav wrote:
>> Hi Lina,
>>
>> On Wednesday 24 September 2014 05:21 AM, Lina Iyer wrote:
>>> Add SPM device bindings for QCOM 8974 based cpus. SPM is the sub-system
>>> power manager and controls the logic around the cores (cpu and L2).
>>>
>>> Each core has an instance of SPM and controls only that core. Each cpu
>>> SPM is configured to support WFI and SPC (standalone-power collapse).
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Lina Iyer <lina.iyer@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8974-pm.dtsi | 69
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8974.dtsi | 10 +++--
>>> 2 files changed, 75 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>> create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8974-pm.dtsi
>>
>> <snip>
>>
>>> +};
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8974.dtsi
>>> b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8974.dtsi
>>> index 69dca2a..0580bc2 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8974.dtsi
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8974.dtsi
>>> @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@
>>> #size-cells = <0>;
>>> interrupts = <1 9 0xf04>;
>>>
>>> - cpu@0 {
>>> + CPU0: cpu@0 {
>> Lina, Stephen boyd has sent some DT change for krait-cpufreq which also
>> renames this node to "cpu0: cpu@0". If you both could sync up and agree
>> on a common naming('cpu0' with caps or not caps) for this node.
>>
> Sure. Will work with Stephen on that.
>
This doesn't seem like a big deal. I imagine Kumar can resolve the
conflict if the two patches merge at the same time.
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
