On Fri, Jun 24, 2022 at 07:14:44PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 24/06/2022 16:16, Serge Semin wrote: > > In accordance with the Generic EHCI/OHCI bindings the corresponding node > > name is suppose to comply with the Generic USB HCD DT schema, which > > requires the USB nodes to have the name acceptable by the regexp: > > "^usb(@.*)?" . Make sure the "generic-ehci" and "generic-ohci"-compatible > > nodes are correctly named. > > > > Signed-off-by: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Acked-by: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@xxxxxxxxx> > > Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > arch/arm/boot/dts/lpc18xx.dtsi | 4 ++-- > > You should split the patchset per architecture, because maybe that's why > no one picks it up? Each patch is sent out to the corresponding mailing list and the maintainers. I don't think splitting the patchset into the subsets will be more efficient especially seeing the initial patchset consisted of 30 patches of which only five left. I was very busy last year with another activities so what was left of this patchset was stalling on my local repo all that time. I have been very surprised to realise that the submitted part still hasn't been merged in for all that time. So I've got back to resubmitting the series. * Though the Qualcom dts have been fixed by you lately. > > Let me pick up ARM bits through my cleanup series. If anyone objects, > please let me know. Ok. Thanks. -Sergey > > Best regards, > Krzysztof
