On Tue, 2014-09-23 at 21:18 -0700, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > On Mon 15 Sep 07:44 PDT 2014, Ivan T. Ivanov wrote: > <snip> > > +static int pmic_gpio_of_xlate(struct gpio_chip *chip, > > + const struct of_phandle_args *gpio_desc, > > + u32 *flags) > > +{ > > + if (chip->of_gpio_n_cells < 2) > > + return -EINVAL; > > + > > + if (flags) > > + *flags = gpio_desc->args[1]; > > + > > + return gpio_desc->args[0] - PMIC_GPIO_PHYSICAL_OFFSET; > > +} > > If you change: > gpiochip_add_pin_range(&state->chip, dev_name(dev), 0, 0, npins); > to: > gpiochip_add_pin_range(&state->chip, dev_name(dev), 1, 0, npins); > > And you treat the gpio functions as taking the gpio number instead of pinctrl > number (i.e. subtract 1 in those), then gpiolib will provide this function for > you. > I am unable to make this work. of_gpio_simple_xlate() didn't know that GPIO range is offset with 1. Requesting last GPIO return error. And debug output looks weird, for example: # cat /sys/kernel/debug/gpio ... GPIOs 220-255, platform/0.c000.gpios, 0.c000.gpios: ... # cat /sys/kernel/debug/pinctrl/0.c000.gpios/gpio-ranges GPIO ranges handled: 1: 0.c000.gpios GPIOS [221 - 256] PINS [0 - 35] Advice, please. > [..] > > + > > +static const struct of_device_id pmic_gpio_of_match[] = { > > + { .compatible = "qcom,spmi-pmic-gpio" }, > > I think this should be more specific, because hopefully the spmi specification > will outlive the current pmic gpio block. > > So I think you need to list the pmic blocks here (e.g. "qcom,pm8941-gpio"). I can rename this to lovely "qcom,qpnp-gpio" :-), in this way driver can outlive bus on which device is connected this time. Regards, Ivan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html