Hi Dmitry,
Thanks for cleaning up MSM8916! :)
On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 05:47:14PM +0300, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> As we are converting this platform to use DT clock bindings, add clocks
> and clock-names properties to the MMCC device tree node.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8916.dtsi | 14 ++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8916.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8916.dtsi
> index 05472510e29d..e905415b3456 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8916.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8916.dtsi
> @@ -934,6 +934,20 @@ gcc: clock-controller@1800000 {
> #reset-cells = <1>;
> #power-domain-cells = <1>;
> reg = <0x01800000 0x80000>;
> + clocks = <&rpmcc RPM_SMD_BB_CLK1_PIN>,
This should be <&xo_board> to avoid functional changes.
If we want to change this to the actual votable clock later this should
probably be <&rpmcc RPM_SMD_XO_CLK_SRC>. AFAIK that clock exists in RPM
on MSM8916 but was never added to the clk-smd-rpm driver (for MSM8916).
Not sure where the pin-controlled BB_CLK1 is coming from here. :)
Thanks,
Stephan
