Re: [Freedreno] [PATCH 3/3] drm/msm/dpu: Add interface support for CRC debugfs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 6/3/2022 12:02 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
On Fri, 3 Jun 2022 at 04:02, Jessica Zhang <quic_jesszhan@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 6/2/2022 3:51 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
On 28/05/2022 01:23, Jessica Zhang wrote:
On 5/27/2022 12:46 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
On 27/05/2022 21:54, Jessica Zhang wrote:
Add support for writing CRC values for the interface block to
the debugfs by calling the necessary MISR setup/collect methods.

Signed-off-by: Jessica Zhang <quic_jesszhan@xxxxxxxxxxx>

[skipped]

+
+        phys->hw_intf->ops.setup_misr(phys->hw_intf, true, 1);
+    }
+}
+
+int dpu_encoder_get_crc(const struct drm_encoder *drm_enc)
+{
+    struct dpu_encoder_virt *dpu_enc;
+    u32 crcs[MAX_PHYS_ENCODERS_PER_VIRTUAL];
+
+    int i, rc;
+
+    if (!drm_enc->crtc) {
+        DRM_ERROR("no crtc found for encoder %d\n", drm_enc->index);
+        return -EINVAL;
+    }
+
+    dpu_enc = to_dpu_encoder_virt(drm_enc);
+
+    for (i = 0; i < dpu_enc->num_phys_encs; i++) {
+        struct dpu_encoder_phys *phys = dpu_enc->phys_encs[i];
+
+        if (!phys->hw_intf || !phys->hw_intf->ops.collect_misr)
+            continue;
+
+        rc = phys->hw_intf->ops.collect_misr(phys->hw_intf, &crcs[i]);

This doesn't look fully correct. Do we need to skip the indices for
the phys without a backing hw_intf?

Sorry if I'm misunderstanding your question, but don't we need to have
a backing hw_intf (and skip if there isn't any) since the methods for
collecting/setting MISR registers is within the hw_intf?

Yes. So the question if we should skip the phys and leave the crcs[i]
untouched, skip the phys and sset crcs[i] to 0 or change
dpu_crtc_parse_crc_source() to return the number of intf-backed
phys_enc's and do not skip any crcs[i].

Thanks for the clarification.

Is it possible to hit a case where a phys_encoder won't have a
corresponding hw_intf?

AFAIK, it seems guaranteed that a phys_encoder will have an hw_intf
since dpu_encoder_setup_display will skip incrementing num_phys_encs if
dpu_encoder_get_intf fails [1].

WB encoders won't have hw_intf. The code checks that either get_intf
or get_wb succeeds.

Got it, I see your point. I'll change the values_cnt to only include the intf-backed phys_encoders then.

Thanks,

Jessica Zhang



[1]
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/msm/-/blob/msm-next/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder.c#L2263


--
With best wishes
Dmitry



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux