On 2022-05-24 00:18:35, Pavel Machek wrote: [...] > > > I'd really like to see the patch fixing the pattern interface (or > > > disabling it). I don't want to push the tree to Linus with that bug. > > > > (I couldn't help but be confused for a minute by this being a reply to > > the original v1 patchset from March 2017 :) ) > > > > Does that mean there's still some time to review / pick up [1] > > (LPG enablement for PM660L)? And even more so for [2] (fixing the use > > of a software-pattern variable in the hardware-pattern code) which > > complements Bjorn's series but hasn't been looked at ever since last > > year. > > There's still time if the patches are perfect. How should I know if a patch is perfect when it has been ignored for over a year [1]? Only Bjorn has reviewed and tested it. I'm not asking for an instant merge, but feedback is appreciated. I don't see any glaring issues with the patch so I'm kindly (re-)asking you to point them out so that I can correct the patch. - Marijn [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-leds/20210418213427.220638-1-marijn.suijten@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
