On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 05:07:53PM +0800, Wang, Yalin wrote: > Hi > > I tested it on my phone, > >From log: > <4>[ 0.000000] INITRD unalign phys address:0x02000000+0x0022fb0e > <4>[ 0.000000] INITRD aligned phys address:0x02000000+0x00230000 > > <4>[ 0.579474] free_initrd_mem: free pfn:8192---8752 > > The tail address is not aligned for most initrd image, > This page will not be freed and lost . Right, so from this I can assume that you only tested it by seeing what the addresses were, and the values used in free_initrd_mem(). What you haven't tested is whether the initrd actually gets used with your changes, which is more what I was interested in given what I found when reading your patch. -- FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.5Mbps down 400kbps up according to speedtest.net. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html