On Tue, 24 May 2022 at 01:44, Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, 24 May 2022 at 00:38, Marijn Suijten > <marijn.suijten@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > parent_hw pointers are easier to manage and cheaper to use than > > repeatedly formatting the parent name and subsequently leaving the clk > > framework to perform lookups based on that name. > > Can you please add a followup patch (or a preface one) removing the > rest of devm_kzalloc()'ed clock names. Argh, stupid me, you did that in the next patch. Please ignore this. > > Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxx> -- With best wishes Dmitry
