On 13-09-2014 01:59 AM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 01:55:50AM +0530, Pramod Gurav wrote:
>>>>> + qdwc = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*qdwc), GFP_KERNEL);
>>>>> + if (!qdwc)
>>>>> + return -ENOMEM;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, qdwc);
>>>>> +
>>>>> + qdwc->dev = &pdev->dev;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + qdwc->core_clk = devm_clk_get(qdwc->dev, "core");
>>>>> + if (IS_ERR(qdwc->core_clk)) {
>>>>> + dev_err(qdwc->dev, "failed to get core clock\n");
>>>>> + return PTR_ERR(qdwc->core_clk);
>>>>> + }
>>>>> +
>>>>> + qdwc->iface_clk = devm_clk_get(qdwc->dev, "iface");
>>>>> + if (IS_ERR(qdwc->iface_clk)) {
>>>>> + dev_dbg(qdwc->dev, "failed to get optional iface clock\n");
>>>>> + qdwc->iface_clk = NULL;
>>>>> + }
>>>>> +
>>>>> + qdwc->sleep_clk = devm_clk_get(qdwc->dev, "sleep");
>>>>> + if (IS_ERR(qdwc->sleep_clk)) {
>>>>> + dev_dbg(qdwc->dev, "failed to get optional sleep clock\n");
>>>>> + qdwc->sleep_clk = NULL;
>>>>> + }
>>>>> +
>>>>> + ret = clk_prepare_enable(qdwc->core_clk);
>>>>> + if (ret) {
>>>>> + dev_err(qdwc->dev, "failed to enable core clock\n");
>>>>> + goto err_core;
>>>>> + }
>>>>> +
>>>>> + ret = clk_prepare_enable(qdwc->iface_clk);
>>>>>
>>>> Should not we check if qdwc->iface_clk is valid?
>>>
>>> read the sources luke.
>> Now I read that its initialized to NULL in fail case but should we call
>> prepare_enable at all if its NULL?
>
> now read the source of clk_enable() and clk_prepare() ;-) NULL is a
> valid clock, it just returns 0. This is better than sprinkling IS_ERR()
> all over the place.
Seen that. I was wrong about IS_ERR. Thanks. :)
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
