On 09/10/14 11:21, Will Deacon wrote: > On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 06:54:45PM +0100, Stephen Boyd wrote: > >> Here's the interdiff. Is there a reason arm64 casts data to an unsigned >> int pointer when what's passed is an int pointer? > There has to be a cast to something because data is a void *. > enable_percpu_irq takes an unsigned int, so I guess that's why it was > chosen. I'm not fussed either way. Right, I'm just annoyed that what's passed in the void * is not an unsigned int, it's an int. I agree that eventually we'll hand it to enable_percpu_irq and there it will be implicitly casted to an unsigned int so it really doesn't matter. > > Feel free to submit the full patch with my ack: > > Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx> > Ok thanks. -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
