Dear Viresh Kumar, On Wed, 10 Sep 2014 17:52:59 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 10 September 2014 17:38, Thomas Petazzoni > <thomas.petazzoni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > + dt_cpufreq_driver.driver_data = dev_get_platdata(&pdev->dev); > > I don't think this is right. What if platform device's platform data > is freed later? > That's why its always better to duplicate that structure instead of playing with > pointers. Isn't the piece of code registering the platform_device supposed to make sure that platform_data doesn't disappear? At least, in PATCH 3/4, I'm using platform_device_register_data(), which does a kmemdup() of the custom data being passed before assigning the struct device->platform_data field. But if you like, I can add one more memory copy :) Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
