On 10 September 2014 15:11, Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > The cpufreq-dt driver tries to get a regulator for each CPU. This > regulator is optional, but when not present, a scary message "failed > to get cpuX regulator" is displayed. Since the regulator is really > optional, we cannot sanely display any useful message, so this commit > simply gets rid of this problematic message. > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c | 3 --- > 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c > index 35d396e..8060022 100644 > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c > @@ -149,9 +149,6 @@ try_again: > reg = reg_cpu; > goto try_again; > } > - > - dev_warn(cpu_dev, "failed to get cpu%d regulator: %ld\n", > - cpu, PTR_ERR(cpu_reg)); What about converting it to dev_dbg() instead? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
