Title copy-paste error: it should read dsi0/dsi0_phy. Can you also
reorder this patch together with the dsi1/dsi1_phy one, and perhaps they
should just be squashed? Otherwise, does a Suggested-by: make sense
here?
- Marijn
On 2022-05-14 02:45:12, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> Follow the typical practice and keep DSI0/DSI0 PHY disabled by default.
> They should be enabled in the board DT files. No existing boards use
> them at this moment.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm630.dtsi | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm630.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm630.dtsi
> index 240293592ef9..8697d40e9b74 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm630.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm630.dtsi
> @@ -1559,6 +1559,8 @@ dsi0: dsi@c994000 {
> phys = <&dsi0_phy>;
> phy-names = "dsi";
>
> + status = "disabled";
> +
> ports {
> #address-cells = <1>;
> #size-cells = <0>;
> @@ -1592,6 +1594,7 @@ dsi0_phy: dsi-phy@c994400 {
>
> clocks = <&mmcc MDSS_AHB_CLK>, <&xo_board>;
> clock-names = "iface", "ref";
> + status = "disabled";
> };
> };
>
> --
> 2.35.1
>
