On 9 September 2014 05:31, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 09/08/14 16:52, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> So more bikeshedding. :-) :) >> Isn't "generic" somewhat too broad? Surely it doesn't cover x86. And does >> it actually cover anything without clocks/regulators? It can work without regulators but not clocks. > I thought when you bikeshed you have to come up with a different color ;-) > > Perhaps "cpufreq_cpus"? I don't have any affection to the word 'generic' here and it can be anything we want it to be. But yeah, we shouldn't let these patches wait for that for too long :) What name do you suggest Rafael? - cpufreq_generic - cpufreq_cpus - cpufreq_dt - cpufreq_platform - cpufreq_cpuX Let me know and I will prepare pending patches accordingly :) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
