On 5/11/22 3:20 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 11:15 PM Tomeu Vizoso
<tomeu.vizoso@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
And use it to store expectations about what the drm/msm driver is
supposed to pass in the IGT test suite.
Also include a configuration file that points to the out-of-tree CI
scripts.
By storing the test expectations along the code we can make sure both
stay in sync with each other, and so we can know when a code change
breaks those expectations.
This will allow all contributors to drm/msm to reuse the infrastructure
already in gitlab.freedesktop.org to test the driver on several
generations of the hardware.
v2:
- Fix names of result expectation files to match SoC
- Don't execute tests that are going to skip on all boards
v3:
- Remove tracking of dmesg output during test execution
Signed-off-by: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
Documentation/gpu/msm_automated_testing.rst | 70 +++++++++
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/ci/gitlab-ci.yml | 11 ++
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/ci/msm.testlist | 144 ++++++++++++++++++
.../gpu/drm/msm/ci/msm_apq8016_results.txt | 141 +++++++++++++++++
.../gpu/drm/msm/ci/msm_apq8096_results.txt | 141 +++++++++++++++++
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/ci/msm_sc7180_results.txt | 142 +++++++++++++++++
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/ci/msm_sdm845_results.txt | 142 +++++++++++++++++
7 files changed, 791 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 Documentation/gpu/msm_automated_testing.rst
create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/ci/gitlab-ci.yml
create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/ci/msm.testlist
create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/ci/msm_apq8016_results.txt
create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/ci/msm_apq8096_results.txt
create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/ci/msm_sc7180_results.txt
create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/ci/msm_sdm845_results.txt
[snip]
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/ci/gitlab-ci.yml b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/ci/gitlab-ci.yml
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..9b7caa7fcab2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/ci/gitlab-ci.yml
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+variables:
+ # Change this to use your fork of drm-ci
+ DRM_CI_PROJECT_PATH: &drm-ci-project-path gfx-ci/drm-ci
+ DRM_CI_COMMIT_SHA: &drm-ci-commit-sha msm
btw, shouldn't we list an exact commit sha (or tag) for drm-ci, or am
I overlooking something? We want to be able to uprev the drm-ci
version (and therefore igt version) in sync with any necessary updates
to the expectations
You are right, that was me being lazy and using a branch name to not
have to update this every time.
But this should better be a commit sha or tag. Will do it on v4.
Cheers,
Tomeu
