On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 10:46 AM Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, 10 May 2022 at 19:52, Rob Clark <robdclark@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > From: Rob Clark <robdclark@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > The offset got dropped by accident. > > > > Fixes: d413e6f97134 ("drm/msm: Drop msm_gem_iova()") > > Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_fb.c | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_fb.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_fb.c > > index 362775ae50af..4269da268a4a 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_fb.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_fb.c > > @@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ uint32_t msm_framebuffer_iova(struct drm_framebuffer *fb, > > struct msm_gem_address_space *aspace, int plane) > > { > > struct msm_framebuffer *msm_fb = to_msm_framebuffer(fb); > > - return msm_fb->iova[plane]; > > + return msm_fb->iova[plane] + fb->offsets[plane]; > > Nit: can we push fb->offsets handling into msm_framebuffer_prepare() > instead? Then the msm_framebuffer_iova() would become trivial? I'd briefly considered it, but ended up putting it here simply because that is where the offset addition was prior to d413e6f97134. Whether that is a good reason or not, idk. (Prior to d413e6f97134 it needed to be here, now it doesn't) BR, -R > > } > > > > struct drm_gem_object *msm_framebuffer_bo(struct drm_framebuffer *fb, int plane) > > -- > > 2.35.1 > > > > > -- > With best wishes > Dmitry