Re: [PATCH 02/32] Introduce flexible array struct memcpy() helpers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> I don't think I can do a declaration and an expression statement at the
> same time with different scopes, but that would be kind of cool. We did
> just move to c11 to gain the in-loop iterator declarations...

Yeah, you'd end up creating a statement-level macro, and I think that
would have poor syntax:

        mem_to_flex_dup(struct something *instance, rc, byte_array,
                        count, GFP_KERNEL);
        if (rc)
           return rc;

I bet you've already considered the simpler form:

        struct something *instance = mem_to_flex_dup(byte_array, count, GFP_KERNEL);
        if (IS_ERR(instance))
            return PTR_ERR(instance);

This doesn't allow you to require a new name, so you effectively lose
the check you're trying to insist upon.

Some way to ask the compiler 'is this reference dead?' would be nice --
it knows if a valid pointer was passed to free, or if a variable has not
been initialized, after all; we just need that exposed at the source
level.

-- 
-keith

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux