Hi,
On Tue, May 3, 2022 at 7:14 PM Sai Prakash Ranjan
<quic_saipraka@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 5/3/2022 6:03 AM, Douglas Anderson wrote:
> > It appears the some sc7180 devices, like the one in my
> > sc7180-trogdor-homestar, report an ID of 407 instead of 425. Add
> > another ID into the list.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >
> > drivers/soc/qcom/socinfo.c | 1 +
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/socinfo.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/socinfo.c
> > index cee579a267a6..2ef1dc2a1dd3 100644
> > --- a/drivers/soc/qcom/socinfo.c
> > +++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/socinfo.c
> > @@ -318,6 +318,7 @@ static const struct soc_id soc_id[] = {
> > { 396, "IPQ8071A" },
> > { 402, "IPQ6018" },
> > { 403, "IPQ6028" },
> > + { 407, "SC7180" },
> > { 421, "IPQ6000" },
> > { 422, "IPQ6010" },
> > { 425, "SC7180" },
>
> Hmm, this ID maps to SM6250 which is a mobile variant. Not sure we should
> use it for SC7180 which already has 425 ID assigned, perks of marketing :)
That's super weird. Any idea why my strongbad reports 407 then? Is it
a firmware bug, or someone misprogrammed something? What can we do to
make the CPU recognized in strongbad?
...and just for extra info, I believe strongbad actually has the
slightly faster version of sc7180. It has a higher GPU/CPU speed. In
some places I've heard it called sc7185, but in other places I've
heard it called just sc7180 with a faster clock speed...
-Doug
