On 09/03, Ulf Hansson wrote: > On 3 September 2014 01:58, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > If we're tuning on a big-endian CPU we'll never determine we properly > > tuned the device because we compare the data we received from the > > controller with a table that assumes the CPU is little-endian. > > Change the table to be an array of bytes instead of 32-bit words > > so we can use memcmp() without needing to byte-swap every word > > depending on the endianess of the CPU. > > > > Cc: Asutosh Das <asutoshd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Venkat Gopalakrishnan <venkatg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Georgi Djakov <gdjakov@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Fixes: 415b5a75da43 "mmc: sdhci-msm: Add platform_execute_tuning implementation" > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Hi Stephen, > > If you want me to pick this up, please repost to linux-mmc as well. > Otherwise you have my ack for it! > Ok I'll repost it now. -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
