Re: [PATCH V10 4/9] mfd: pm8008: Add reset-gpios

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 4/27/2022 12:00 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
Quoting Satya Priya Kakitapalli (Temp) (2022-04-26 23:03:08)
On 4/27/2022 10:58 AM, Satya Priya Kakitapalli (Temp) wrote:
On 4/18/2022 10:34 AM, Satya Priya Kakitapalli (Temp) wrote:
On 4/15/2022 5:40 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
Quoting Satya Priya (2022-04-14 05:30:13)
diff --git a/drivers/mfd/qcom-pm8008.c b/drivers/mfd/qcom-pm8008.c
index c472d7f..97a72da 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/qcom-pm8008.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/qcom-pm8008.c
+               return PTR_ERR(chip->reset_gpio);
+       }
+       gpiod_set_value(chip->reset_gpio, 1);
Does this do anything? Does this work just as well?

     reset_gpio = devm_gpiod_get(chip->dev, "reset", GPIOD_OUT_LOW);
     if (IS_ERR(reset_gpio))
         return PTR_ERR(reset_gpio);

This is not working as expected. We need to add
"gpiod_set_value(chip->reset_gpio, 1);"  to actually toggle the line.

I checked again and it is working after using GPIOD_OUT_HIGH instead of LOW.

reset_gpio = devm_gpiod_get(chip->dev, "reset", GPIOD_OUT_HIGH);
      if (IS_ERR(reset_gpio))
          return PTR_ERR(reset_gpio);

What do you have in DT for the 'reset-gpios' property? GPIOD_OUT_HIGH
means the reset line is asserted, which presumably you don't want to be
the case because you typically deassert a reset to "take it out of
reset". Using GPIOD_OUT_HIGH probably works because DT has the wrong
GPIO flag, i.e.  GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH, for an active low reset, or vice
versa.


Yeah, I had GPIOD_OUT_HIGH in DT, now I changed and it is working fine with GPIOD_OUT_LOW.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux