On 08/27/2014 09:24 PM, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 11:06 PM, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On 07/29, Rob Herring wrote: > [..] >>> >>> You might as well do of_property_read_u32 in the below example. >>> >> >> Fair enough. The example is probably too simple. Things are >> sometimes slightly more complicated and a simple >> of_property_read_u32() isn't going to work in the case of >> multiple reg values or when reg-names is in play. >> > > But do we have such cases in the Qualcomm PMICs? yes, we have few - rtc, iadc and partially regulators. > > The only case I've hit so far is for gpios and mpps, where it feels > like reg should be base, size and not simply base reg of first gpio - > but that's a different thing. > > Also, so far it seems like most drivers just code the base address in > the driver, as we have very specific compatibles. > > > How about we stop trying so hard to make this "perfect" and just merge > something close to Josh's original proposal and ignore this problem? > Currently all we're doing is delaying any possibility of getting > drivers for the individual blocks merged. > If we have the dt bindings require the reg to be there, we can discuss > and change this all we want later! I totally agree with you, the latest PMIC version of the patches sent two weeks ago follow this assumption but I didn't receive any ack/reviewed-by from anyone and we miss the merge window. :( -- regards, Stan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
