Lina Iyer <lina.iyer@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 10:18:24AM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote: >>Lina Iyer <lina.iyer@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> >>> Signed-off-by: Lina Iyer <lina.iyer@xxxxxxxxxx> >> >>Why the move? It looks like scm-boot.c still calls into the main >>scm_call() stuff that still lives under arch/arm/mach-qcom, and not in >>arm64, so I'm not seeing the motiviation for the change (and the >>changelog didn't help explain either :) >> >>Kevin > > I dint intend on moving the scm-boot for 64 bit purposes, but that > would be a good argument :) My motivation was to move the scm-boot.h, but > figured might as well clean up the mach-qcom in the process, per > guidance. Thanks for clarifying. I suspect that should be a separate cleanup series with its own descriptive changelog, because to me it only looks like a partial cleanup since only some of the stuff was moved out, and it's not abvious what it will be sharing that code. Kevin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
