On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 10:40:10AM -0500, Andrew Halaney wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 06:51:36PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> > On Qcom UFS platforms, the reset control line seems to be optional
> > (for SoCs like MSM8996 and probably for others too). The current logic
> > tries to mimic the `devm_reset_control_get_optional()` API but it also
> > continues the probe if there is an error with the declared reset line in
> > DT/ACPI.
> >
> > In an ideal case, if the reset line is not declared in DT/ACPI, the probe
> > should continue. But if there is problem in acquiring the declared reset
> > line (like EPROBE_DEFER) it should fail and return the appropriate error
> > code.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c | 10 +++++-----
> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c
> > index 0d2e950d0865..5db0fd922062 100644
> > --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c
> > +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c
> > @@ -1002,13 +1002,13 @@ static int ufs_qcom_init(struct ufs_hba *hba)
> > host->hba = hba;
> > ufshcd_set_variant(hba, host);
> >
> > - /* Setup the reset control of HCI */
> > - host->core_reset = devm_reset_control_get(hba->dev, "rst");
> > + /* Setup the optional reset control of HCI */
> > + host->core_reset = devm_reset_control_get_optional(hba->dev, "rst");
> > if (IS_ERR(host->core_reset)) {
> > err = PTR_ERR(host->core_reset);
> > - dev_warn(dev, "Failed to get reset control %d\n", err);
> > - host->core_reset = NULL;
> > - err = 0;
> > + if (err != -EPROBE_DEFER)
> > + dev_err(dev, "Failed to get reset control %d\n", err);
>
> Could we use dev_err_probe() here?
>
Yes. Will do the same for patch 2/5 as well.
Thanks,
Mani
> Otherwise, looks good to me.
>
> > + goto out_variant_clear;
> > }
> >
> > /* Fire up the reset controller. Failure here is non-fatal. */
> > --
> > 2.25.1
> >
>
