On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 12:02:30AM -0000, subhashj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > >> + /* > >> + * put runtime pm reference for well-known logical units, > >> + * drivers are expected to _get_* again during probe. > >> + */ > >> + if (scsi_is_wlun(sdev->lun)) > >> + scsi_autopm_put_device(sdev); > > Special casing the well known LUNs here seems wrong. Shouldn't we do > this > > for any devices that don't get a driver attached to them? > > Agreed, i will replace "if (scsi_is_wlun(sdev->lun))" check with "if > (sdev->sdev_gendev.driver)". I would really prefer the callers of autopm get/put to be symmetric to issues with later than probe driver attach or similar. Think of the case say the CDROM or tape driver only gets loaded after we already did a bus scan. A quick check of the autopm code and it's underlying implementation seems to suggest that nesting them is okay. If that's indeed the case I would suggest to restructure it the following way: - make the scsi_autopm_put_device call you add at the end of scsi_sysfs_add_sdev unconditional to make it balance out the get earlier in the function (and delete the now incorrect comment above the scsi_autopm_get_device call). - let drivers do paired get/put calls in their probe/remove methods. If you still need any wlun changes after that please send them as a separate patch with a detailed description on why you need it. All in all the autopm code and it's underlying implementation is highly confusing, so additional documentation on it would also be very welcome. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
