Re: [PATCH 4/4] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8250: camss: Add CCI definitions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/04/2022 03:06, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
On Sat 09 Apr 11:45 CDT 2022, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:

sm8250 has two CCI busses with two I2C busses apiece.

Co-developed-by: Julian Grahsl <jgrahsl@xxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Julian Grahsl <jgrahsl@xxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8250.dtsi | 82 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  1 file changed, 82 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8250.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8250.dtsi
index 91ed079edbf7..98e96527702b 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8250.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8250.dtsi
@@ -3150,6 +3150,88 @@ videocc: clock-controller@abf0000 {
  			#power-domain-cells = <1>;
  		};
+ cci0: cci@ac4f000 {
+			compatible = "qcom,sm8250-cci";
+			#address-cells = <1>;
+			#size-cells = <0>;
+
+			reg = <0 0x0ac4f000 0 0x1000>;
+			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 460 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
+			power-domains = <&camcc TITAN_TOP_GDSC>;
+
+			clocks = <&camcc CAM_CC_CAMNOC_AXI_CLK>,
+				 <&camcc CAM_CC_SLOW_AHB_CLK_SRC>,
+				 <&camcc CAM_CC_CPAS_AHB_CLK>,
+				 <&camcc CAM_CC_CCI_0_CLK>,
+				 <&camcc CAM_CC_CCI_0_CLK_SRC>;
+			clock-names = "camnoc_axi",
+				      "slow_ahb_src",
+				      "cpas_ahb",
+				      "cci",
+				      "cci_src";
+
+			pinctrl-names = "default", "sleep";
+			pinctrl-0 = <&cci0_default &cci1_default>;
+			pinctrl-1 = <&cci0_sleep &cci1_sleep>;

I would prefer that you include these in the same patch.

You mean CAMSS and CCI in the one patch ?
Sure.


+
+			status = "disabled";
+
+			cci_i2c0: i2c-bus@0 {
+				reg = <0>;
+				clock-frequency = <1000000>;
+				#address-cells = <1>;
+				#size-cells = <0>;
+			};
+
+			cci_i2c1: i2c-bus@1 {
+				reg = <1>;
+				clock-frequency = <1000000>;
+				#address-cells = <1>;
+				#size-cells = <0>;
+			};
+		};
+
+		cci1: cci@ac50000 {
+			compatible = "qcom,sm8250-cci";
+			#address-cells = <1>;
+			#size-cells = <0>;
+
+			reg = <0 0x0ac50000 0 0x1000>;
+			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 271 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
+			power-domains = <&camcc TITAN_TOP_GDSC>;
+
+			clocks = <&camcc CAM_CC_CAMNOC_AXI_CLK>,
+				 <&camcc CAM_CC_SLOW_AHB_CLK_SRC>,
+				 <&camcc CAM_CC_CPAS_AHB_CLK>,
+				 <&camcc CAM_CC_CCI_1_CLK>,
+				 <&camcc CAM_CC_CCI_1_CLK_SRC>;
+			clock-names = "camnoc_axi",
+				      "slow_ahb_src",
+				      "cpas_ahb",
+				      "cci",
+				      "cci_src";
+
+			pinctrl-names = "default", "sleep";
+			pinctrl-0 = <&cci2_default &cci3_default>;
+			pinctrl-1 = <&cci2_sleep &cci3_sleep>;
+
+			status = "disabled";
+
+			cci_i2c2: i2c-bus@0 {

Are these names (the label) used somewhere in the schematics? How about
cci0_i2c0 and cci1_i2c0 instead (unless these names are defined by some
documentation)?

Schematic just says cci_i2c_sda0, cci_i2c_sda3 and so on.

I'll rename.

---
bod



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux