Re: [PATCH v7 2/2] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: add lpass lpi pin controller node

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 4/12/2022 1:02 AM, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
Thanks for your time Matthias!!!
On Mon, Apr 11, 2022 at 07:23:04PM +0530, Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu wrote:
Add LPASS LPI pinctrl node required for Audio functionality on sc7280
based platforms.

Signed-off-by: Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu <quic_srivasam@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Co-developed-by: Venkata Prasad Potturu <quic_potturu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Venkata Prasad Potturu <quic_potturu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-idp.dtsi |  84 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi     | 107 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  2 files changed, 191 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-idp.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-idp.dtsi
index 4ba2274..ea751dc 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-idp.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-idp.dtsi
@@ -238,6 +238,90 @@
  	modem-init;
  };
+&dmic01 {
Shouldn't these nodes be in the PINCTRL section at their respective
positions in alphabetical order?

These are not part of tlmm pin control section. These are part of lpass_tlmm section.

In your previous comment you asked to remove &lpass_tlmm. Hence brought out.


nit: since you are keeping the groups the group names are a bit generic IMO.
e.g. it is fairly obvious that 'dmic01_clk' refers to a clock pin, however
just 'dmic01' is a bit vague. You could consider adding the prefix 'lpass_'
to the group names for more clarity.
as dmic01 has both clk and data section, I don't think keeping clk is appropriate here.

+	clk {
+		drive-strength = <8>;
+	};
+};
+
+&dmic01_sleep {
+	clk {
+		drive-strength = <2>;
+		bias-disable;
+	};
+
+	data {
+		pull-down;
+	};
+};
+
+&dmic23 {
+	clk {
+		drive-strength = <8>;
+	};
+};
+
+&dmic23_sleep {
+	clk {
+		drive-strength = <2>;
+		bias-disable;
+	};
+
+	data {
+		pull-down;
+	};
+};
+
+&rx_swr {
+	clk {
+		drive-strength = <2>;
+		slew-rate = <1>;
+		bias-disable;
+	};
+
+	data {
+		drive-strength = <2>;
+		slew-rate = <1>;
+		bias-bus-hold;
+	};
+};
+
+&rx_swr_sleep {
+	clk {
+		drive-strength = <2>;
+		bias-pull-down;
+	};
+
+	data {
+		drive-strength = <2>;
+		bias-pull-down;
+	};
+};
+
+&tx_swr {
+	clk {
+		drive-strength = <2>;
+		slew-rate = <1>;
+		bias-disable;
+	};
+
+	data {
+		slew-rate = <1>;
+		bias-bus-hold;
+	};
+};
+
+&tx_swr_sleep {
+	clk {
+		drive-strength = <2>;
+		bias-pull-down;
+	};
+
+	data {
+		bias-bus-hold;
+	};
+};
+
  &pcie1 {
  	status = "okay";
  	perst-gpio = <&tlmm 2 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
index 8099c80..c692420 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
@@ -1987,6 +1987,113 @@
  			qcom,bcm-voters = <&apps_bcm_voter>;
  		};
+ lpass_tlmm: pinctrl@33c0000 {
+			compatible = "qcom,sc7280-lpass-lpi-pinctrl";
+			reg = <0 0x033c0000 0x0 0x20000>,
+				<0 0x03550000 0x0 0x10000>;
+			gpio-controller;
+			#gpio-cells = <2>;
+			gpio-ranges = <&lpass_tlmm 0 0 15>;
+
+			#clock-cells = <1>;
+
+			dmic01: dmic01 {
+				clk {
+					pins = "gpio6";
 From the schematics I interpret that the LPASS GPIOs 0-9 are mapped to the
SC7280 GPIOs 144-153. Is that correct?
Yes. But we refer with GPIOs 0-9 in driver.

+					function = "dmic1_clk";
+				};
+
+				data {
+					pins = "gpio7";
+					function = "dmic1_data";
+				};
+			};
+
+			dmic01_sleep: dmic01-sleep {
+				clk {
+					pins = "gpio6";
+					function = "dmic1_clk";
+				};
+
+				data {
+					pins = "gpio7";
+					function = "dmic1_data";
+				};
+			};
+
+			dmic23: dmic23 {
+				clk {
+					pins = "gpio8";
+					function = "dmic2_clk";
+				};
+
+				data {
+					pins = "gpio9";
+					function = "dmic2_data";
+				};
+			};
+
+			dmic23_sleep: dmic23_sleep {
s/dmic23_sleep/dmic23-sleep/ for the node name.
Okay.

+				clk {
+					pins = "gpio8";
+					function = "dmic2_clk";
+				};
+
+				data {
+					pins = "gpio9";
+					function = "dmic2_data";
+				};
+			};
+
+			rx_swr: rx-swr {
+				clk {
+					pins = "gpio3";
+					function = "swr_rx_clk";
+				};
+
+				data {
+					pins = "gpio4", "gpio5";
+					function = "swr_rx_data";
+				};
+			};
+
+			rx_swr_sleep: rx-swr-sleep {
+				clk {
+					pins = "gpio3";
+					function = "swr_rx_clk";
+				};
+
+				data {
+					pins = "gpio4", "gpio5";
+					function = "swr_rx_data";
+				};
+			};
+
+			tx_swr: tx-swr {
+				clk {
+					pins = "gpio0";
+					function = "swr_tx_clk";
+				};
+
+				data {
+					pins = "gpio1", "gpio2", "gpio14";
+					function = "swr_tx_data";
+				};
+			};
+
+			tx_swr_sleep: tx-swr-sleep {
+				clk {
+					pins = "gpio0";
+					function = "swr_tx_clk";
+				};
+
+				data {
+					pins = "gpio1", "gpio2", "gpio14";
+					function = "swr_tx_data";
+				};
+			};
+		};
+
  		gpu: gpu@3d00000 {
  			compatible = "qcom,adreno-635.0", "qcom,adreno";
  			reg = <0 0x03d00000 0 0x40000>,
--
2.7.4




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux