Re: [PATCH 08/10] dt-bindings: soc: qcom,smd: convert to dtschema

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 02/04/2022 15:46, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Fri, 01 Apr 2022 22:10:33 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> Convert the Qualcomm Shared Memory Driver bindings to DT Schema.
>>
>> Changes against original bindings: enforce only specific names of child
>> nodes, instead of any names.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  .../regulator/qcom,smd-rpm-regulator.yaml     |   2 +-
>>  .../bindings/remoteproc/qcom,q6v5.txt         |   2 +-
>>  .../bindings/remoteproc/qcom,wcnss-pil.txt    |   2 +-
>>  .../bindings/soc/qcom/qcom,smd-rpm.yaml       |   4 +-
>>  .../devicetree/bindings/soc/qcom/qcom,smd.txt |  98 -------------
>>  .../bindings/soc/qcom/qcom,smd.yaml           | 137 ++++++++++++++++++
>>  6 files changed, 142 insertions(+), 103 deletions(-)
>>  delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/qcom/qcom,smd.txt
>>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/qcom/qcom,smd.yaml
>>
> 
> My bot found errors running 'make DT_CHECKER_FLAGS=-m dt_binding_check'
> on your patch (DT_CHECKER_FLAGS is new in v5.13):
> 
> yamllint warnings/errors:
> 
> dtschema/dtc warnings/errors:
> /builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/qcom/qcom,smd.example.dt.yaml: rpm-requests: 'clock-controller' does not match any of the regexes: 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'
> 	From schema: /builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/qcom/qcom,smd-rpm.yaml
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/qcom/qcom,smd.example.dt.yaml:0:0: /example-0/shared-memory/rpm/rpm-requests/clock-controller: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['qcom,rpmcc-msm8974', 'qcom,rpmcc']
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/qcom/qcom,smd.example.dt.yaml:0:0: /example-0/shared-memory/rpm/rpm-requests/clock-controller: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['qcom,rpmcc-msm8974', 'qcom,rpmcc']

These are being fixed by patch 9-10, so their order could be reversed to
avoid the warnings.


Best regards,
Krzysztof



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux