On 29.3.2022 12.18, Sandeep Maheswaram (Temp) wrote:
> Hi Mathias,Heikki
>
> On 3/25/2022 9:08 PM, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 04:33:27PM +0200, Mathias Nyman wrote:
>>> On 25.3.2022 13.27, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
>>>> On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 12:36:22AM +0200, Mathias Nyman wrote:
>>>>> On 24.3.2022 14.27, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
>>>>>> On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 12:07:11PM +0530, Sandeep Maheswaram wrote:
>>>>>>> Currently the phy init is done from dwc3 and also xhci which makes the
>>>>>>> runtime_usage value 2 for the phy which causes issue during runtime
>>>>>>> suspend. When we run the below command the runtime_status still shows
>>>>>>> active.
>>>>>>> echo auto > /sys/bus/platform/devices/88e3000.phy/power/control
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> dwc3 manages PHY by own DRD driver, so skip the management by
>>>>>>> HCD core by setting this quirk.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Sandeep Maheswaram <quic_c_sanm@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>> drivers/usb/dwc3/host.c | 13 +++++++++++++
>>>>>>> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc3/host.c b/drivers/usb/dwc3/host.c
>>>>>>> index eda8719..d4fcf06 100644
>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/usb/dwc3/host.c
>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/usb/dwc3/host.c
>>>>>>> @@ -13,6 +13,12 @@
>>>>>>> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
>>>>>>> #include "core.h"
>>>>>>> +#include <linux/usb/xhci-plat.h>
>>>>>>> +#include <linux/usb/xhci-quirks.h>
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>> +static const struct xhci_plat_priv xhci_plat_dwc3_xhci = {
>>>>>>> + .quirks = XHCI_SKIP_PHY_INIT,
>>>>>>> +};
>>>>>>> static void dwc3_host_fill_xhci_irq_res(struct dwc3 *dwc,
>>>>>>> int irq, char *name)
>>>>>>> @@ -122,6 +128,13 @@ int dwc3_host_init(struct dwc3 *dwc)
>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>> + ret = platform_device_add_data(xhci, &xhci_plat_dwc3_xhci,
>>>>>>> + sizeof(xhci_plat_dwc3_xhci));
>>>>>>> + if (ret) {
>>>>>>> + dev_err(dwc->dev, "failed to add data to xHCI\n");
>>>>>>> + goto err;
>>>>>>> + }
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>> ret = platform_device_add(xhci);
>>>>>>> if (ret) {
>>>>>>> dev_err(dwc->dev, "failed to register xHCI device\n");
>>>>>> I think you should just use device property:
>>>>>>
>>>>> This was suggested in an earlier series, but was rejected as it also added
>>>>> the property as a device tree parameter.
>>>>>
>>>>> I think adding more device properties can be messy in the long run, especially if we
>>>>> need to add them for many of the existing xhci quirks.
>>>>> We also end up with a mix where some device properties are listed as device tree
>>>>> parameters, and some not.
>>>>>
>>>>> Defining xhci quirks and platform data structure in headers shared with dwc3 and cdns3
>>>>> allow those drivers to easily set any existing xhci quirk, or other possible optional
>>>>> callbacks.
>>>>>
>>>>> cdns3 driver is already doing this, but it includes the full xhci.h header.
>>>>> This series cleans up that a bit so cdns3 will only include xhci quirk bits and
>>>>> platform data structure.
>>>>>
>>>>> On the downside we add a couple xhci related header files to include/linux/usb/
>>>>> Let me know if you see any other issues I missed with this approach.
>>>> The problem here is that these drivers are now coupled together, and
>>>> that should not be taken lightly. We have a dependency hell in our
>>>> hands with a lot of drivers, and the culprit is always platform data.
>>>>
>>>> Build-in device properties may be messy, but I would still say they
>>>> are less messy than those quirk flags - you got to admit, they are a
>>>> mess. The benefit from build-in properties is in any case the fact
>>>> that they remove the need to couple these drivers together.
>>> Agree, quirk bits are messy. Any suggestion that would work with
>>> PCI xHCI devices, devicetree, and "pure" platform devices?
>> I think xHCI driver should always be able to rely on being able to
>> read this kind of information from the fwnode. If there is no actual
>> firmware node (DT or ACPI), or if it's missing some information, the
>> glue driver needs to populate software node for the xHCI.
>>
>> Right now I just want to avoid having to pass the quirks using
>> platform data from drivers such as drivers/usb/cdns3/host.c and
>> drivers/usb/dwc3/host.c to xHCI.
>>
>> One way we could do that is by defining compatibility ID for both of
>> them that we provide using a single device property (like I guess DT
>> does). Then based on that compatibility ID, xhci-plat.c can set the
>> actual "static" quirk flags. That we could already do easily. How
>> would that sound to you?
Sounds good.
>
> This was my previous patch where I was using device tree property. Should we go ahead with this approach?
>
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-msm/cover/1636353710-25582-1-git-send-email-quic_c_sanm@xxxxxxxxxxx/
>
> Any further changes to this ?
By dropping the DT part of that series we get a similar built-in device property
solution as Heikki initially suggested.
How about adding the compatibility ID device property that was just suggested?
Then matching the Id in xhci-plat.c against a static table containing Ids and
xhci_plat_priv structures, with the needed quirks for dwc3.
Thanks
-Mathias
