Re: [PATCH V8 1/7] dt-bindings: mfd: pm8008: Modify the compatible as per driver

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Quoting Satya Priya (2022-03-25 04:58:05)
> Modify the compatible string as per the pm8008 mfd driver.
> Add reset-gpios property and make interrupts and interrupt-cells
> as optional properties, they are not strictly required and may
> cause yaml compilation errors when not added in the DT files.

Does it have an interrupt controller inside? If so, the properties
should be present even if the driver isn't using them.

>
> Also, change the node name in example to match with the
> pm8008_infra DT node.
>
> Signed-off-by: Satya Priya <quic_c_skakit@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Changes in V5:
>  - Remove compatible for regulators node.
>  - Move supply nodes of the regulators to chip level.
>
> Changes in V6:
>  - No changes.
>
> Changes in V7:
>  - Removed the intermediate regulators node and added ldos
>    directly under mfd node.
>
> Changes in V8:
>  - Change the compatible as per driver, remove interrupts from required
>    properties, add reset-gpios and move regulators to separate binding.
>
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/qcom,pm8008.yaml | 15 ++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/qcom,pm8008.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/qcom,pm8008.yaml
> index ec3138c..12431ea 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/qcom,pm8008.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/qcom,pm8008.yaml
> @@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ description: |
>
>  properties:
>    compatible:
> -    const: qcom,pm8008
> +    const: qcom,pm8008-infra

Why is the compatible being replaced with -infra postfix?

>
>    reg:
>      description:
> @@ -44,6 +44,10 @@ properties:
>    "#size-cells":
>      const: 0
>
> +  reset-gpios:
> +    description: |
> +      Specifies the GPIO to be toggled to bring pm8008 chip out of reset.

Remove description. Add maxItems: 1

> +
>  patternProperties:
>    "^gpio@[0-9a-f]+$":
>      type: object
> @@ -88,10 +92,8 @@ patternProperties:
>  required:
>    - compatible
>    - reg
> -  - interrupts
>    - "#address-cells"
>    - "#size-cells"
> -  - "#interrupt-cells"

Should reset-gpios be required? I'd expect this patch to be adding
reset-gpios and making it required and that's about it. Given that
there isn't a DT using this compatible upstream so far it looks like we
don't need to do anything like worry about backwards compatibility.

>
>  additionalProperties: false
>
> @@ -99,11 +101,12 @@ examples:
>    - |
>      #include <dt-bindings/mfd/qcom-pm8008.h>
>      #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h>
> +    #include <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h>
>      qupv3_se13_i2c {
>        #address-cells = <1>;
>        #size-cells = <0>;
> -      pm8008i@8 {
> -        compatible = "qcom,pm8008";
> +      pm8008_infra: pmic@8 {

Remove unused phandle.

> +        compatible = "qcom,pm8008-infra";
>          reg = <0x8>;
>          #address-cells = <1>;
>          #size-cells = <0>;
> @@ -113,6 +116,8 @@ examples:
>          interrupt-parent = <&tlmm>;
>          interrupts = <32 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
>
> +        reset-gpios = <&pm8350c_gpios 4 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> +
>          pm8008_gpios: gpio@c000 {
>            compatible = "qcom,pm8008-gpio", "qcom,spmi-gpio";
>            reg = <0xc000>;
> --
> 2.7.4
>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux