Re: [REPOST PATCH v4 07/13] drm/msm/disp/dpu1: Add support for DSC in encoder

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 23-03-22, 20:10, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On 17-02-22, 23:32, Marijn Suijten wrote:
> > On 2022-02-10 16:04:17, Vinod Koul wrote:

> > > +
> > > +	slice_count = dsc->drm->slice_count;
> > > +	slice_per_intf = DIV_ROUND_UP(width, dsc->drm->slice_width);
> > > +
> > > +	/*
> > > +	 * If slice_count is greater than slice_per_intf then default to 1.
> > > +	 * This can happen during partial update.
> > > +	 */
> > > +	if (slice_count > slice_per_intf)
> > > +		slice_count = 1;
> > > +
> > > +	bytes_in_slice = DIV_ROUND_UP(dsc->drm->slice_width *
> > > +				      dsc->drm->bits_per_pixel, 8);
> > > +	total_bytes_per_intf = bytes_in_slice * slice_per_intf;
> > > +
> > > +	dsc->eol_byte_num = total_bytes_per_intf % 3;
> > > +	dsc->pclk_per_line =  DIV_ROUND_UP(total_bytes_per_intf, 3);
> > > +	dsc->bytes_in_slice = bytes_in_slice;
> > > +	dsc->bytes_per_pkt = bytes_in_slice * slice_count;
> > > +	dsc->pkt_per_line = slice_per_intf / slice_count;
> > > +}
> > 
> > I've seen the same calculations duplicated twice in dsi code.  Since the
> > msm_display_dsc_config struct is available in a header, perhaps a single
> > - easily reviewable and maintainable - calculation function should be
> > available there too?
> 
> Let me try check if we can make it common..

I rechecked and we can actually remove this as we do this caln in timing
and update the dsc structure there. So this fn is dropped now

-- 
~Vinod



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux