Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] block: add basic hardware-wrapped key support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Mar 03, 2022 at 04:53:56PM -0800, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 2/27/22 23:05, Eric Biggers wrote:
> > @@ -68,7 +71,10 @@ static int __init bio_crypt_ctx_init(void)
> >   	/* Sanity check that no algorithm exceeds the defined limits. */
> >   	for (i = 0; i < BLK_ENCRYPTION_MODE_MAX; i++) {
> > -		BUG_ON(blk_crypto_modes[i].keysize > BLK_CRYPTO_MAX_KEY_SIZE);
> > +		BUG_ON(blk_crypto_modes[i].keysize >
> > +		       BLK_CRYPTO_MAX_STANDARD_KEY_SIZE);
> > +		BUG_ON(blk_crypto_modes[i].security_strength >
> > +		       blk_crypto_modes[i].keysize);
> >   		BUG_ON(blk_crypto_modes[i].ivsize > BLK_CRYPTO_MAX_IV_SIZE);
> >   	}
> 
> Does the following advice from Linus Torvalds apply to the above code:
> "because there is NO EXCUSE to knowingly kill the kernel"? See also
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/10/4/1.

These are boot time checks, so the advice doesn't apply.  If the code is buggy
here, then kernels with CONFIG_BLK_INLINE_ENCRYPTION enabled won't boot.  I
would prefer compile-time checks, of course, but that isn't possible here.  This
is the next best thing.

- Eric



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux