Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] dt-bindings: clock: add QCOM SM6125 display clock bindings

[Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 26/02/2022 21:09, Marijn Suijten wrote:
> From: Martin Botka <martin.botka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Add device tree bindings for display clock controller for
> Qualcomm Technology Inc's SM6125 SoC.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Martin Botka <martin.botka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  .../bindings/clock/qcom,dispcc-sm6125.yaml    | 87 +++++++++++++++++++
>  .../dt-bindings/clock/qcom,dispcc-sm6125.h    | 41 +++++++++
>  2 files changed, 128 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,dispcc-sm6125.yaml
>  create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/clock/qcom,dispcc-sm6125.h
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,dispcc-sm6125.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,dispcc-sm6125.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..3465042d0d9f
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,dispcc-sm6125.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,87 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/clock/qcom,dispcc-sm6125.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: Qualcomm Display Clock Controller Binding for SM6125
> +
> +maintainers:
> +  - Martin Botka <martin.botka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> +
> +description: |
> +  Qualcomm display clock control module which supports the clocks and
> +  power domains on SM6125.
> +
> +  See also:
> +    dt-bindings/clock/qcom,dispcc-sm6125.h
> +
> +properties:
> +  compatible:
> +    enum:
> +      - qcom,sm6125-dispcc
> +
> +  clocks:
> +    items:
> +      - description: Board XO source
> +      - description: Byte clock from DSI PHY0
> +      - description: Pixel clock from DSI PHY0
> +      - description: Pixel clock from DSI PHY1
> +      - description: Link clock from DP PHY
> +      - description: VCO DIV clock from DP PHY
> +      - description: AHB config clock from GCC
> +
> +  clock-names:
> +    items:
> +      - const: bi_tcxo
> +      - const: dsi0_phy_pll_out_byteclk
> +      - const: dsi0_phy_pll_out_dsiclk
> +      - const: dsi1_phy_pll_out_dsiclk
> +      - const: dp_phy_pll_link_clk
> +      - const: dp_phy_pll_vco_div_clk
> +      - const: cfg_ahb_clk
> +
> +  '#clock-cells':
> +    const: 1
> +
> +  '#power-domain-cells':
> +    const: 1
> +
> +  reg:
> +    maxItems: 1
> +
> +required:
> +  - compatible
> +  - reg
> +  - clocks
> +  - clock-names
> +  - '#clock-cells'
> +  - '#power-domain-cells'
> +
> +additionalProperties: false
> +
> +examples:
> +  - |
> +    #include <dt-bindings/clock/qcom,rpmcc.h>
> +    #include <dt-bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-sm6125.h>
> +    clock-controller@5f00000 {
> +      compatible = "qcom,sm6125-dispcc";
> +      reg = <0x5f00000 0x20000>;
> +      clocks = <&rpmcc RPM_SMD_XO_CLK_SRC>,
> +               <&dsi0_phy 0>,
> +               <&dsi0_phy 1>,
> +               <0>,

This does not look like a valid phandle. This clock is required, isn't it?


Best regards,
Krzysztof