On Wed, 23 Feb 2022, Heiko Stuebner wrote: > Hi Lee, > > Am Mittwoch, 23. Februar 2022, 10:16:01 CET schrieb Lee Jones: > > On Mon, 14 Feb 2022, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > > > > Include generic pwm.yaml schema, which enforces PWM node naming. Keep > > > the old name in bindings as deprecated. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/google,cros-ec.yaml | 4 ++++ > > > > Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx> > > what is your expectation regarding this patch? > > Are you planning to merge it or are you expecting this to go through > some other tree? > > The binding-change here is backward-comaptible in that the old > node-name is still in it, only marked as deprecated, so in theory > this patch should be able to be applied on its own without > causing defects. In an ideal world, it would be broken up and I would take the MFD part. Is that possible or are there dependencies? Or, worse still, does the whole set need to be applied at once? -- Lee Jones [李琼斯] Principal Technical Lead - Developer Services Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
